The Most Expensive Service Trip Is the One That Didn’t Need to Happen

The Most Expensive Service Trip Is the One That Didn’t Need to Happen

For some operations, the constraint is not labor. It is distance. The assets are spread across a wide geography, and every service trip carries a fully-loaded cost: a vehicle, fuel, a driver, the miles between stops. For this buyer, the most expensive trip is the one that didn’t need to happen, because the full cost of getting there bought nothing.

Send a fuel truck to a tank that is still half full, and the trip accomplished nothing but its own cost. The calendar does not know which tanks are low, so it sends the truck to all of them, and an unnecessary trip costs exactly what a necessary one does.

None of this is news to a buyer who lives on the road. It is their own problem, named. They have watched fully-loaded trucks roll out to assets that did not need them, and they have done the math on every wasted mile. They were never confused about where the cost was. They were waiting for a way to send the truck only when the trip was real.

So the buy is not routing, and not a faster truck. It is the trip that comes off the schedule entirely. Servicing on signal sends the truck when a tank is actually low, and the asset that is fine never costs a visit. The most expensive trip stops happening, because it stops being scheduled.

The fleet buyer arrives here from geography, where the operations leader arrived from labor and the compliance leader from risk. The constraint is different, and the answer is the same. Service runs on signal, not schedule, so the truck only rolls when the trip is real.

‍